Skip to main content

Georgia Valuation Source

Residential Appraisal Experts

Estate & Legal

What Attorneys Should Specify When Ordering a Litigation Appraisal

Clear scoping at the start of an assignment makes the difference between a report that holds up and one that invites challenge.

All Resources
Estate & Legal5 min read

Divorce, probate disputes, condemnation, and other litigation matters frequently rely on an independent, well-documented opinion of a property's value. The strength of that report often depends less on the appraiser's skill alone and more on how clearly the assignment was scoped at the outset. The following points are worth confirming before an engagement letter goes out.

Four Things to Confirm Before the Assignment Begins

Intended Use & Effective Date

State whether the assignment calls for a current-date opinion of value or a retrospective (past-date) one — divorce, probate, and condemnation matters often turn on a specific date that must be identified up front, not left to interpretation.

Scope of Work & Report Type

Confirm whether a full appraisal report or a more limited restricted-use report meets the case's needs — a report intended for opposing counsel, a hearing, or discovery generally calls for a more detailed, fully documented format than an internal-planning assignment.

Engagement Terms That Preserve Independence

An engagement letter should never suggest a predetermined value or outcome. Appraisers who accept assignments contingent on reaching a specific number risk both the report's credibility and its admissibility.

Availability for Deposition or Testimony

If the matter may proceed to a hearing or trial, confirm the appraiser's availability and experience providing deposition or expert testimony before the assignment begins, not after the report is delivered.

Consistency Matters as Much as a Single Report

For firms that handle recurring case types — divorce asset division, probate settlement, condemnation — working with the same independent appraiser across matters builds a track record of consistent methodology that opposing counsel, judges, and Boards of Equalization come to recognize, rather than starting the credibility conversation over with a new appraiser on every file.

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on the matter and how each side's counsel wants to proceed — some cases use a single neutral appraiser by agreement, while others involve separate appraisers for each party. Discuss this with the appraiser and opposing counsel early, since it affects scope and communication.

The Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) is the generally recognized ethical and performance standard for U.S. real estate appraisers. A litigation-ready report should be prepared in compliance with USPAP so its methodology can withstand scrutiny in a legal setting.

Retrospective appraisals can generally be completed well after the effective date itself, since they rely on historical market data and sales records rather than a present-day inspection. The appraiser will confirm data availability for the specific date once the assignment scope is set.

The written appraisal report and any related testimony are related but distinct — the report documents the opinion of value and its support, while testimony (if needed) allows the appraiser to explain and defend that opinion under questioning. Confirm which (or both) your matter requires.

Avoid any request that implies a target number or outcome. An appraiser's value comes from independence — a report produced to reach a predetermined conclusion is far less useful (and far more vulnerable to challenge) than one produced through an unbiased process.

This information is provided for general educational purposes and is not legal advice. Assignment scope, report type, and admissibility requirements vary by matter and jurisdiction — consult the appraiser and case counsel for guidance specific to your situation.

Scoping an Appraisal for a Case?